tc: f_u32: allow skip_hw and skip_sw flags to be last

u32 uses NEXT_ARG() incorrectly when parsing skip_hw and skip_sw
flags.  NEXT_ARG() ensures there is another argument on the command
line, and is used in handling <keyword> <value> syntax to move past
<keyword> and ensure there is a <value> to read.

Commit 5e5b3008d1 ("tc: f_u32: Add support for skip_hw and skip_sw
flags") seems to have copy pasted the handling from the previous
command - "police", which needs an extra parameter and is kind of
special due to the use of parse_police() helper.

The combination of NEXT_ARG() and continue worked fine as long as
skip_sw/skip_hw wasn't last, e.g.:

$ tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress prio 101 protocol ipv6 \
    u32 match ip6 priority 0xa0 0xe0 skip_hw action pass

But would fail if it was last:

$ tc filter add dev dummy0 ingress prio 101 protocol ipv6 \
    u32 match ip6 priority 0xa0 0xe0 flowid :1 skip_hw
Command line is not complete. Try option "help"

Remove the NEXT_ARG()s and the continues, and let the argc--; argv++;
at the end of the loop do its job.

Fixes: 5e5b3008d1 ("tc: f_u32: Add support for skip_hw and skip_sw flags")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jakub Kicinski 2018-11-05 19:23:27 -08:00 committed by Stephen Hemminger
parent 1a03ac6b05
commit 9c5f4251d6
1 changed files with 0 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -1147,13 +1147,9 @@ static int u32_parse_opt(struct filter_util *qu, char *handle,
terminal_ok++;
continue;
} else if (strcmp(*argv, "skip_hw") == 0) {
NEXT_ARG();
flags |= TCA_CLS_FLAGS_SKIP_HW;
continue;
} else if (strcmp(*argv, "skip_sw") == 0) {
NEXT_ARG();
flags |= TCA_CLS_FLAGS_SKIP_SW;
continue;
} else if (strcmp(*argv, "help") == 0) {
explain();
return -1;